submissions: 17 Mars 2017
submission website: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=quad2017
notification to authors: 15 April 2017
final version due: 19 May 2017
conference: 17-21 July 2017
interpretation of determiners relies on quantifiers — in a
general acceptation of this later term which includes
generalised quantifiers, generics, definite descriptions i.e.
any operation that applies to one or several formulas with a
free variable, binds it and yields a formula or possibly a
generic term (the operator is then called a subnector,
following Curry). There is a long history of quantification in
the Ancient and Medieval times at the border between logic and
philosophy of language, before the proper formalisation of
quantification by Frege.
A common solution for natural language semantics is the so-called theory of generalised quantifiers. Quantifiers like « some, exactly two, at most three, the majority of, most of, few, many, … » are all described in terms of functions of two predicates viewed as subsets.
Nevertheless, many mathematical and linguistic questions remain open.
On the mathematical side, little is known about generalised , generalised and vague quantifiers, in particular about their proof theory. On the other hand, even for standard quantifiers, indefinites and definite descriptions, there exist alternative formulations with choice functions and generics or subnectors (Russell’s iota, Hilbert-Bernays, eta, epsilon, tau). The computational aspects of these logical frameworks are also worth studying, both for computational linguistic software and for the modelling of the cognitive processes involved in understanding or producing sentences involving quantifiers.
On the linguistic side, the relation between the syntactic structure and its semantic interpretation, quantifier raising, underspecification, scope issues,… are not fully satisfactory. Furthermore extension of linguistic studies to various languages have shown how complex quantification is in natural language and its relation to phenomena like generics, plurals, and mass nouns.
Finally, and this can be seen as a link between formal models of quantification and natural language, there by now exist psycholinguistic experiments that connect formal models and their computational properties to the actual way human do process sentences with quantifiers, and handle their inherent ambiguity, complexity, and difficulty in understanding.
All those aspects are
connected in the didactics of mathematics and computer science:
there are specific difficulties to teach (and to learn) how
to understand, manipulate, produce and prove
quantified statements, and to determine the proper level
of formalisation between bare logical formulas and written or
spoken natural language.
This workshop aims at
gathering mathematicians, logicians,
linguists, computer scientists to present their latest
advances in the study of quantification.
Among the topics that wil be addressed are the following :
The program committee
is looking for contributions introducing
new viewpoints on quantification and determiners,
the novelty being either in the mathematical logic framework
or in the linguistic description or in the cognitive modelling.
Submitting purely original work is not mandatory,
but authors should clearly mention that the work is not original,
and why they want to present it at this workshop
(e.g. new viewpoint on already published results)
Submissions should be
- 12pt font (at least)
- 1inch/2.5cm margins all around (at least)
- less than 2 pages (references exluded)
- with an abstract of less then 100 words
and they should be submitted in PDF by easychair here: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=quad2017
In case the committee
thinks it is more appropriate,
some papers can be accepted as a poster with a lightning talk.
Final versions of
accepted papers may be slightly longer.
They will be published on line.
We also plan to publish postproceedings