Information: this page is not translated in english

2013-03-22 Quantifying disagreement in argument-based reasoning

22 mars 2013 --10h, salle E.324 : Richard Booth -- Université du Luxembourg
Quantifying disagreement in argument-based reasoning
An argumentation framework can be seen as expressing, in an abstract way, the conflicting information of an underlying logical knowledge
base. This conflicting information often allows for the presence of more than one possible reasonable position (extension/labelling) which
one can take. A relevant question, therefore, is how much these positions differ from each other. In this talk, we will examine the issue of how to define meaningful measures of distance between the (complete) labellings of a given argumentation framework. We provide concrete distance measures based on argument-wise label difference, as well as based on the notion of *issues*, and examine their properties.

Last update on 18/06/2013